For many landlords, 2026 was expected to be a year of gradual normalisation. Interest rates have stabilised, rental income has increased across many regions, and the frantic refinancing pressure of earlier years has eased. Yet despite these improvements, a growing number of portfolio landlords are finding that remortgaging is far harder than anticipated.

At Willow Private Finance, we are seeing experienced landlords with strong portfolios, solid rental coverage, and long track records being declined, restricted, or pushed into less favourable terms when attempting to refinance. In many cases, these are borrowers who would have passed comfortably just a few years ago.

The reason is not a single policy change or regulatory shift. Instead, it is the cumulative effect of how lenders now assess portfolio risk, borrower sustainability, and long-term exposure. Buy-to-let lending in 2026 is no longer assessed property by property—it is assessed holistically, strategically, and often conservatively.

This article explains why remortgaging a buy-to-let portfolio has become more difficult, what lenders are really looking at in 2026, and how landlords can still navigate the market successfully.

The Shift From Property-Level to Portfolio-Level Risk

One of the most significant changes affecting landlords is the way lenders now view portfolio exposure. Historically, remortgaging often focused on the individual property: its value, rental income, and loan-to-value ratio.

In 2026, that approach is largely obsolete.

Most lenders now assess buy-to-let borrowers at portfolio level. This means total borrowing, aggregate loan-to-value, rental coverage across the entire portfolio, geographic concentration, and even property type mix all influence underwriting decisions.

A single weak property—perhaps with a lower yield, older structure, or regional risk—can materially affect the outcome of a refinance across the wider portfolio. This shift catches many landlords off guard, particularly those with long-standing holdings that have never previously been scrutinised in this way.

This change is explored in more detail in Mortgage Applications With Multiple Properties: Why Portfolio Size Matters More in 2026

Affordability Is No Longer Just About Rental Coverage

Many landlords assume that if rental income comfortably covers mortgage payments, refinancing should be straightforward. In 2026, this assumption is increasingly incorrect.

While rental coverage remains important, lenders now layer additional affordability and stress-testing criteria on top. These often include higher notional interest rates, assumed void periods, maintenance costs, and management expenses—even where properties are well-run and fully let.

Some lenders also apply portfolio-wide stress tests that require surplus rental income beyond what would be expected on a single-property basis. The effect is that portfolios which appear healthy on paper may still fail internal affordability thresholds.

This is particularly challenging for landlords who expanded during lower-rate environments and are now refinancing at higher absolute debt levels, even if yields have improved.

The Impact of Lender Concentration Limits

Another factor making portfolio remortgaging harder in 2026 is lender concentration risk.

Many lenders have internal caps on how much exposure they are willing to take to a single borrower or group. These limits are not always disclosed upfront and can vary depending on property type, geography, and borrower profile.

Landlords who have historically used the same lender repeatedly—often via product transfers—may find that lender appetite has quietly diminished. When they attempt to refinance or restructure, they may be told no additional lending is available, or that terms are less favourable.

This issue often arises when landlords attempt to “keep things the same,” a strategy that can carry hidden costs, as discussed in Remortgaging in 2026: Why Matching Your Deal Can Cost More

Product Transfers and the Illusion of Safety

Product transfers have been widely used by landlords over the past few years to avoid full affordability reassessment. While this has provided short-term stability, it has also created longer-term challenges.

Repeated product transfers can leave a portfolio aligned to one lender’s internal criteria rather than the wider market. Over time, this increases the risk that when a full refinance is required—perhaps to release capital, restructure debt, or exit a lender—the borrower no longer fits mainstream criteria elsewhere.

This problem has become more visible in 2026 as lenders diverge further in their treatment of portfolio risk. We explore this dynamic in Remortgaging in 2026 After Using a Product Transfer First

Property Type and Regional Risk Are Under Greater Scrutiny

Not all buy-to-let properties are viewed equally in 2026. Lenders are increasingly sensitive to property type, construction, and regional demand.

Flats, leasehold properties, mixed-use buildings, and older housing stock often attract more conservative valuations and stricter lending terms. In some regions, lenders apply additional stress to rental assumptions due to perceived volatility or regulatory risk.

For portfolio landlords, this means that diversification does not always work in their favour. A portfolio spread across multiple regions or property types may face more underwriting friction than a more uniform one.

Personal Income Still Matters, Even for Experienced Landlords

A common misconception among landlords is that buy-to-let lending is assessed independently of personal income. While rental income is central, lenders in 2026 place greater emphasis on borrower sustainability.

Personal income, tax position, age, and overall financial resilience are increasingly factored into underwriting decisions—particularly for larger portfolios or higher leverage cases.

Landlords approaching later working years or relying heavily on rental income alone may find lender appetite narrowing, even where portfolio performance is strong.

Documentation and Transparency Expectations Have Increased

Another practical challenge landlords face in 2026 is the level of documentation required.

Lenders expect detailed portfolio schedules, up-to-date valuations, rental statements, tax calculations, and sometimes business plans outlining future strategy. Any inconsistencies or gaps can delay or derail applications.

For landlords who have managed portfolios informally or through legacy arrangements, this increased scrutiny can feel onerous—but it reflects a broader shift toward professionalised underwriting.

Why Many Landlords Are Surprised by Declines

Most landlords who struggle to refinance in 2026 do not see it coming. They assume experience, scale, and track record will smooth the process.

Instead, they encounter automated decisioning, opaque declines, and limited feedback. Often there is no single issue—just a portfolio that no longer fits a lender’s risk profile.

This is where preparation and lender selection become critical. Submitting a portfolio to the wrong lender can result in unnecessary declines that complicate future applications.

What Still Works for Portfolio Landlords in 2026

Despite these challenges, portfolio remortgaging is far from impossible. It simply requires a more strategic approach.

Successful landlords focus on structure rather than speed. They assess which parts of a portfolio should be refinanced together, which lenders are aligned with their asset mix, and how borrowing should be sequenced over time.

In some cases, specialist or private lenders provide transitional solutions that preserve flexibility while longer-term restructuring is planned. In others, reducing exposure or consolidating lending improves overall outcomes.

The key is understanding that buy-to-let finance in 2026 is no longer transactional—it is strategic.

Looking Ahead: Portfolio Lending Beyond 2026

There is little indication that lenders will relax portfolio criteria in the near term. If anything, data-driven underwriting and risk segmentation will continue to intensify.

Landlords who adapt early, maintain clear documentation, and engage proactively with lender appetite will be best placed to refinance successfully.

Those who assume past approvals guarantee future access may find options narrowing.

How Willow Private Finance Can Help

Willow Private Finance specialises in complex buy-to-let and portfolio remortgaging cases. We work across the whole of market, including specialist and private lenders, to structure solutions aligned with modern portfolio underwriting.

Our approach focuses on lender strategy, portfolio presentation, and long-term flexibility—helping landlords refinance even where mainstream routes fall short.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Why is buy-to-let remortgaging harder in 2026?
Because lenders now assess portfolio-level risk, apply stricter affordability stress tests, and limit exposure more carefully.

Q2: Do lenders still assess properties individually?
Rarely. Most lenders consider the full portfolio alongside the individual property.

Q3: Are product transfers still a good option for landlords?
They can be useful short term but may reduce long-term flexibility.

Q4: Does personal income matter for portfolio landlords?
Yes. Lenders increasingly assess borrower sustainability alongside rental income.



Q5: Can specialist lenders help where high-street banks decline?
Often yes, particularly for complex or larger portfolios.

📞 Want Help Navigating Today’s Market?

Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.

We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.