Many borrowers entering the remortgaging process in 2026 are caught off guard by how much attention lenders pay to recent credit use. For those with strong incomes, stable employment, and a long history of meeting mortgage payments, the assumption is often that small or short-term borrowing should not matter.

In reality, recent credit activity has become one of the most common friction points in modern underwriting.

At Willow Private Finance, we regularly see otherwise strong applications slowed, restricted, or declined due to credit behaviour that borrowers view as sensible or temporary—such as using a credit card for cashflow smoothing, taking out a personal loan, or financing a vehicle shortly before a remortgage.

The challenge is not that lenders are becoming punitive. Rather, they are interpreting credit use through a very different risk lens than they did historically. In 2026, credit behaviour is no longer assessed purely on balances or repayment history—it is analysed as a signal of financial resilience and future affordability risk.

This article explains why recent credit use still trips lenders up in 2026, how underwriting has evolved, and what borrowers can do to avoid unnecessary problems when remortgaging.

Why Credit Behaviour Matters More Than Ever

Credit use has always formed part of mortgage underwriting, but its role has changed significantly.

In the past, lenders focused primarily on whether credit commitments were affordable and whether payments were being made on time. Today, lenders are far more interested in why credit has been used and what it implies about a borrower’s underlying financial position.

Advances in data analysis have allowed lenders to interpret patterns rather than isolated figures. Recent credit activity—particularly in the six to twelve months before a remortgage—is often treated as a proxy for cashflow pressure, even where income is strong.

This shift explains why borrowers with impeccable repayment histories can still encounter resistance when recent borrowing appears inconsistent with their stated financial profile.

The Difference Between Historic Credit and Recent Credit

One of the most misunderstood aspects of underwriting in 2026 is the distinction lenders make between historic and recent credit use.

Older credit accounts that are well managed and long established are generally viewed positively. They demonstrate experience with credit and consistent repayment behaviour.

Recent credit, however, is scrutinised far more closely. New loans, increased card balances, or recently opened facilities prompt underwriters to ask questions about motivation and sustainability. Even when repayments are affordable, lenders may view the timing as a potential risk indicator.

This is especially relevant for borrowers who apply to remortgage shortly after taking on new commitments, assuming that affordability alone will carry the application.

Why “Small” Credit Can Still Be a Big Issue

Borrowers are often surprised to learn that modest credit use can have an outsized impact on affordability and lender perception.

This is because lenders rarely look at credit in isolation. A personal loan, car finance agreement, or revolving credit facility feeds into broader affordability models that include stress testing and future rate assumptions.

In some cases, the issue is not the monthly payment itself but how that commitment interacts with a lender’s internal buffers. Even relatively small obligations can materially reduce borrowing capacity when combined with conservative stress rates.

This becomes particularly problematic for borrowers who are attempting to “just match” their existing mortgage, a strategy that often overlooks how lender models have changed, as discussed in Remortgaging in 2026: Why Matching Your Deal Can Cost More

Revolving Credit and Utilisation Ratios

Credit cards remain one of the most common stumbling blocks in 2026.

Lenders are increasingly focused on utilisation ratios rather than balances alone. Even where balances are cleared monthly, high utilisation relative to limits can raise concerns about reliance on revolving credit.

From an underwriting perspective, this behaviour may suggest cashflow smoothing rather than discretionary use—particularly if it coincides with other borrowing or lifestyle expenditure.

Borrowers who use credit cards strategically often underestimate how negatively this can be interpreted without context.

Personal Loans and the “Why Now?” Question

Personal loans attract particular scrutiny because they are often viewed as indicative of short-term financial need.

Underwriters routinely ask why a loan was taken out recently and whether it signals a change in financial circumstances. Even where the stated purpose is reasonable—home improvements, vehicle purchase, or consolidation—the timing relative to a remortgage matters.

In some cases, lenders may assume that a borrower would not take on additional debt unless underlying cashflow were under pressure. This assumption can be difficult to overcome without proper explanation and lender selection.

Car Finance and PCP Agreements

Vehicle finance has become a frequent obstacle in remortgaging applications.

PCP and lease agreements often carry higher assumed costs in affordability models than borrowers expect. Some lenders assess these commitments at full contractual amounts, regardless of whether the borrower intends to change vehicles or settle the agreement early.

This can materially affect borrowing capacity, particularly where combined with other recent credit use. Borrowers often underestimate how impactful vehicle finance can be in modern underwriting.

Why Lenders Treat Recent Credit as a Forward Risk Signal

The underlying reason recent credit use causes issues is that lenders now prioritise forward-looking risk assessment.

Rather than asking whether a borrower has coped historically, lenders ask whether their current behaviour suggests resilience under future stress. Recent credit use—especially where it increases shortly before a remortgage—can be interpreted as a warning sign, even if that interpretation feels unfair to the borrower.

This approach reflects broader regulatory and internal risk management pressures rather than individual borrower judgement.

Credit Use and Product Transfers: A False Sense of Security

Many borrowers assume that if they can secure a product transfer, credit use is irrelevant. While product transfers often bypass affordability checks, they can create longer-term issues.

Borrowers who rely on transfers to avoid scrutiny may find that when a full remortgage is eventually required, accumulated credit use and changed circumstances create significant barriers.

This dynamic is explored further in Remortgaging in 2026 After Using a Product Transfer First

Documentation, Transparency, and Explanation

In 2026, lenders expect clear explanations where recent credit use exists.

Applications that proactively address the purpose, duration, and repayment strategy for credit commitments are far more likely to succeed. Conversely, unexplained or poorly presented credit activity can lead to automated declines or conservative terms.

This highlights the importance of structuring applications rather than simply submitting figures.

Why Borrowers Are Often Surprised by Declines

Most borrowers do not anticipate issues because they view credit use as sensible, temporary, or well managed. Lenders, however, interpret the same behaviour through a risk framework designed to anticipate future pressure rather than past success.

This mismatch of perspective is one of the most common causes of frustration in the remortgaging process.

What Still Works in 2026

Despite these challenges, remortgaging after recent credit use is far from impossible.

The key lies in timing, lender selection, and presentation. In some cases, delaying an application until credit behaviour stabilises materially improves outcomes. In others, selecting lenders with more nuanced credit assessment approaches makes the difference.

Strategic advice remains critical—particularly where borrowers assume that strong income alone will override recent borrowing.

Looking Ahead: Credit Sensitivity Is Here to Stay

There is little indication that lenders will relax their approach to recent credit use. If anything, increased data availability and automation will continue to heighten sensitivity to borrowing behaviour.

Borrowers who plan ahead and understand how credit is interpreted will be far better placed to remortgage successfully.

How Willow Private Finance Can Help

Willow Private Finance specialises in remortgaging cases involving recent credit use, complex income structures, and non-standard borrower profiles. We work across the whole of market, including specialist lenders, to align applications with lender appetite and mitigate unnecessary declines.

Our approach focuses on timing, structure, and narrative—ensuring that credit behaviour is understood rather than misinterpreted.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Will recent credit use automatically prevent remortgaging in 2026?
No, but it can limit lender choice and borrowing capacity depending on timing and structure.

Q2: How recent is “recent” for lenders?
Typically six to twelve months, though this varies by lender.

Q3: Do credit cards matter if I clear them monthly?
Yes. Utilisation and behaviour still influence affordability models.

Q4: Is car finance a problem when remortgaging?
It can be, particularly where affordability buffers are applied conservatively.



Q5: Can specialist lenders help if mainstream banks decline?
Often yes, especially where credit use is well explained and structured.

📞 Want Help Navigating Today’s Market?

Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.

We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.