Not every borrower fits neatly into a lender’s box. Increasingly, property finance in 2025 involves clients with complex income streams — bonuses, dividends, offshore earnings, or multiple business interests — or international buyers with little or no UK footprint. These borrowers may find it straightforward to secure a short-term bridge or development facility, where the focus is on the asset. But when it comes to the exit, the story changes.
As we explored in Bridging to Mortgage: How to Transition Smoothly in 2025, the jump from short-term to long-term finance is often where deals succeed or fail. For borrowers with complex income or overseas status, the hurdles are higher — and if not addressed early, they can derail the entire project.
This article explores the challenges these clients face, how lenders assess their exits, and what strategies ensure successful repayment.
Mortgage underwriting has become far more rigorous in 2025. For PAYE borrowers with stable salaries, affordability is relatively straightforward. But for those relying on self-employed earnings, multiple company dividends, or irregular bonuses, the picture is less clear.
Traditional lenders often struggle to interpret complex income. Some discount bonuses, others apply heavy haircuts to dividends, and many will not accept overseas income at all. A borrower who appears highly bankable on paper may find their refinance application falls apart under scrutiny.
This disconnect creates significant exit risk. A bridge lender may have been comfortable with the security, but if the borrower cannot transition to a long-term facility, default looms.
For more on how lenders approach non-standard earnings, see Can I Get a Mortgage with Complex Income?.
For international buyers, the challenges are even greater. Many UK lenders require a domestic credit footprint, which overseas clients simply do not have. Others demand higher deposits, stricter affordability tests, or evidence of UK tax residency.
Currency adds another layer of complexity. As we explored in Currency Risk and Income Verification: Challenges of Foreign Income, lenders may discount foreign income to account for exchange rate volatility. A client earning in USD or AED may find their borrowing capacity significantly reduced compared to UK earners on the same headline salary.
This makes exit planning critical. Without a clear understanding of lender appetite for overseas borrowers, clients risk arranging a bridge that they cannot refinance.
From the lender’s side, credibility is everything. When assessing a loan application, credit committees ask: Can this borrower genuinely exit into long-term finance?
For complex income borrowers, lenders want to see tax returns, accounts, and consistency across multiple years. They will stress-test affordability using conservative assumptions, often ignoring bonuses or fluctuating income.
For overseas borrowers, lenders will scrutinise documentation, source of wealth, and residency structures. Private banks may offer flexibility, but only with clear, verified income and often at higher entry points.
This means that for exits to succeed, borrowers must not only have the right income but be able to present it in a way that lenders trust.
In 2024, Willow worked with a Middle Eastern entrepreneur purchasing a £6 million London property. The acquisition was funded via a bridge, with the planned exit being a private bank mortgage. The borrower’s income came from multiple companies in different jurisdictions, paid in USD and AED.
Mainstream lenders declined, citing lack of UK credit and complex income. By engaging a private bank early, structuring documentation across all jurisdictions, and translating income into sterling under lender-approved assumptions, Willow secured a long-term facility. The bridge was repaid on time, and the borrower retained the property with confidence.
The lesson: for overseas borrowers with complex profiles, exit planning cannot be left until the last minute. It must be part of the strategy from day one.
1. Engage Specialist Lenders Early.
Not all lenders treat income the same way. Some will take a broader view of bonuses, pensions, or international earnings. Identifying these lenders before the bridge is agreed ensures the exit is achievable.
2. Structure Documentation Carefully.
Income must be presented in a way lenders can understand. This often means consolidating accounts, evidencing dividend flows, or formalising contracts. For overseas borrowers, notarised translations or audited accounts may be required.
3. Build in Buffers.
As we noted in
Why Exit Risk Keeps Lenders Awake at Night, lenders discount assumptions. Borrowers should plan conservatively, assuming some income will be ignored and some valuations will come in lower than expected.
4. Consider Private Banks and Specialist Brokers.
For high-net-worth clients, private banks can be more flexible, particularly where global income or assets are involved. But they also take longer to approve, which makes early engagement essential. See
Private Bank Mortgages Explained: Benefits and Drawbacks for more detail.
5. Use Bridge Terms Wisely.
Borrowers with complex profiles should avoid bridge terms that leave no margin for delay. Short extensions may be necessary while long-term facilities are finalised.
One of the most common mistakes among complex borrowers is waiting until the bridge nears maturity before tackling the refinance. By then, documentation gaps, valuation shortfalls, or lender appetite shifts are hard to fix.
As highlighted in Common Exit Pitfalls for Property Developers, timing is everything. Applying for a mortgage early, stress-testing assumptions, and engaging lenders upfront transforms the exit from a risk into a certainty.
At Willow Private Finance, we specialise in structuring exits for borrowers with complex income or overseas status. Our team understands how lenders interpret income, how to prepare documentation, and which banks to approach for each profile.
In one recent case, we supported a UK-based lawyer with multiple income streams from partnership drawings, consultancy, and overseas property. Traditional lenders rejected the refinance plan, but by consolidating income evidence and engaging a specialist lender, we secured the exit on time.
In another, we guided an international family office purchasing in London. The bridge was arranged quickly, but the long-term facility relied on structuring income from offshore trusts. By working with a private bank familiar with these structures, Willow secured terms that satisfied both lender and borrower.
The outcome in both cases was the same: an exit that lenders trusted and borrowers could rely on.
Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.
We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.

Experience. Integrity. Trust.
About the Author — Wesley Ranger
Wesley Ranger is the Founder and Director of Willow Private Finance. He has over 20 years’ experience helping borrowers with complex income and international profiles secure credible exits. Wesley specialises in structuring bridge-to-mortgage strategies for high-net-worth and overseas clients, ensuring that even the most complicated financial circumstances lead to successful repayment.
Important Notice
This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Property finance carries risk, including the risk of default or repossession if loans are not repaid. Exit strategies should be assessed carefully and tailored to individual circumstances. Always seek professional advice before entering into any finance agreement. Willow Private Finance is directly authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN: 588422).
