In 2026, the UK mortgage market for loans between £5 million and £20 million operates under a different set of pressures to mainstream lending. While base rates have stabilised following the Bank of England’s easing cycle, large-loan underwriting has not softened in parallel. For borrowers operating at this level, the biggest threat to a successful outcome is no longer pricing alone, but execution risk.

Execution risk refers to the likelihood that a transaction fails, stalls, or materially changes between initial terms and completion. At higher loan sizes, lenders are acutely aware that complexity multiplies risk. Credit committees, valuers, and legal teams apply deeper scrutiny, and any weakness in structure, documentation, or sequencing can derail an otherwise attractive deal.

At Willow Private Finance, this has become one of the defining themes of £5m+ lending in 2026. Borrowers often focus on headline rate comparisons, assuming that competitive pricing equates to certainty. In practice, the lender most likely to complete on agreed terms is often not the one quoting the lowest initial margin. Understanding why execution now outweighs pricing is essential. Related considerations around complex underwriting are explored further in High Value Mortgage Underwriting Explained.

This article examines how execution risk manifests in large UK mortgages, why lenders prioritise it in 2026, and how borrowers can materially improve certainty of completion.

The Large-Loan Lending Environment in 2026

Large UK mortgages in 2026 sit at the intersection of cautious regulation and selective lender appetite. Although headline rates have eased, lenders remain highly sensitive to concentration risk, reputational exposure, and post-completion performance. The Bank of England has been explicit that affordability and stress testing expectations remain appropriate, particularly for higher-risk lending segments (https://www.bankofengland.co.uk).

At the same time, the Financial Conduct Authority continues to emphasise evidence-based lending decisions and fair customer outcomes. For £5m–£20m mortgages, this translates into enhanced governance, more layers of approval, and lower tolerance for ambiguity (https://www.fca.org.uk).

As a result, lenders increasingly differentiate not just between borrowers, but between transactions. A deal that appears strong on paper can still fail if execution risk is poorly managed. This is why credit committees in 2026 focus as much on how a loan will complete as on whether it should be approved in principle.

How £5m–£20m Mortgages Are Actually Underwritten

Unlike standard residential lending, large mortgages are rarely assessed through linear processes. They involve parallel workstreams across credit, risk, valuation, and legal teams. Each introduces potential friction.

In 2026, underwriting at this level places heavy emphasis on certainty. Lenders look closely at whether income evidence is final or provisional, whether asset values are stable or exposed to volatility, and whether the proposed structure relies on future events. The more assumptions a transaction requires, the higher the execution risk appears.

Valuation is a particularly sensitive area. At £5m–£20m levels, properties often fall outside standard comparables. Any disagreement between borrower expectations and valuer conclusions can force re-crediting or re-structuring late in the process. Lenders are acutely aware of this risk and factor it into their willingness to proceed.

Why Headline Rates Can Be Misleading

Headline rates in the large-loan market often reflect best-case assumptions. They are typically quoted subject to full underwriting, valuation outcomes, and credit approval. In 2026, borrowers who anchor on pricing too early frequently underestimate how conditional those terms are.

A marginally lower rate may come from a lender with a rigid credit process, limited tolerance for complexity, or slower internal timelines. If issues arise mid-process, that lender may retrade, impose conditions, or withdraw altogether. The cost of a failed execution can far exceed any saving achieved through pricing.

For £5m–£20m borrowers, time, certainty, and reputational considerations often matter more than basis-point optimisation. Lenders know this and increasingly compete on reliability rather than headline pricing, even if that distinction is not immediately visible.

Common Execution Risks in Large Mortgages

Execution risk in 2026 typically arises from a small number of recurring issues. One is income misalignment, where borrower expectations do not match lender methodology. Another is asset complexity, particularly where overseas holdings or private investments are involved.

Legal risk also plays a significant role. Large loans often involve complex ownership structures, trusts, or corporate entities. Any uncertainty around title, beneficial ownership, or security can delay or derail completion.

Finally, sequencing risk is frequently underestimated. Submitting an application before documentation is final, or approaching the wrong lender first, can create negative momentum that is difficult to reverse. At this level, early missteps tend to be amplified rather than forgiven.

Where Large-Loan Transactions Most Often Break Down in 2026

The most common point of failure for £5m–£20m mortgages in 2026 occurs after indicative terms are issued but before final credit approval. Borrowers assume momentum is secured, only to encounter additional conditions or revised assumptions.

This often reflects gaps between the initial presentation and the lender’s deeper due diligence. Income that appeared acceptable at outline stage may be reclassified. Assets assumed to be liquid may be discounted. Valuation outcomes may differ materially from expectations.

This is typically the point at which Willow Private Finance is engaged — before another lender is approached, to review structure, sequencing, and lender fit. At this stage, most successful borrowers involve a specialist like Willow Private Finance to sense-check the case before it reaches another credit committee.

Structuring for Certainty Rather Than Optimism

In 2026, successful large mortgages are structured conservatively, even where borrowers have strong profiles. This does not mean overpaying, but it does mean prioritising lenders whose credit culture aligns with the transaction.

Structuring for certainty involves stress-testing assumptions internally before lenders do. It means aligning income presentation with lender frameworks, anticipating valuation sensitivity, and addressing legal complexity early.

It also involves managing borrower expectations. Understanding that the best outcome is not the cheapest quote, but the one that completes on agreed terms, is central to navigating this market.

Hypothetical Scenario

Consider a £12m residential purchase funded with a £7.5m mortgage. Two lenders issue indicative terms. One offers a lower rate but flags multiple conditions subject to credit and valuation. The other offers a slightly higher margin but has already reviewed income, asset structure, and property type in detail.

As the process unfolds, the first lender retrades following valuation adjustments and requests further documentation, extending timelines. The second lender proceeds as expected, completing on original terms. The difference in outcome is not borrower strength, but execution risk management.

The Direction of Large Mortgages Beyond 2026

Looking ahead, execution risk is likely to remain a defining feature of £5m–£20m lending. Regulatory expectations show no sign of easing, and lenders continue to prioritise portfolio quality over volume.

Borrowers who adapt by focusing on structure, certainty, and lender alignment will continue to access competitive finance. Those who focus narrowly on headline pricing are more likely to encounter friction.

How Willow Private Finance Can Help

Willow Private Finance is an independent, whole-of-market intermediary specialising in complex and high-value mortgage transactions. We work with borrowers, advisers, and family offices to manage execution risk across £5m–£20m loans. Our role is to align structure, documentation, and lender selection so that transactions complete as intended, without unnecessary retrading or delay.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does execution risk matter more for £5m–£20m mortgages?
Because larger loans involve greater complexity, more stakeholders, and stricter governance, increasing the likelihood of delays or changes.

Is the lowest rate usually the best option?
Not necessarily. A slightly higher rate from a lender with strong execution reliability can result in a better overall outcome.

Can execution risk be reduced?
Yes. Proper structuring, realistic assumptions, and appropriate lender selection significantly reduce execution risk.

Do private banks handle execution better than high-street lenders?
Not always. Execution quality varies by institution and transaction, not lender type alone.



When should a specialist broker be involved?
Ideally before any lender is approached, to manage structure and sequencing from the outset.

📞 Want Help Reducing Execution Risk on a £5m+ Mortgage in 2026?

Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.

We’ll help you prioritise certainty and structure over headline pricing.