For lenders, a profitable loan book is not measured solely by interest earned. It is measured by the proportion of loans that repay on time, in full, and without costly enforcement. When defaults rise, even high-margin lending quickly becomes unprofitable. Default interest may seem like additional yield, but in reality, it consumes management time, erodes capital, and damages credibility with investors and regulators.
As explored in How Lenders Can Reduce Default Risk Through Broker Partnerships, brokers play a vital role in filtering out weak exit strategies. But the responsibility does not end there. Lenders themselves must be proactive in how they assess and monitor exits. In 2025, the lenders who insist on robust exit planning are the ones whose loan books will outperform.
Every loan that defaults tells the same story: the exit failed. A development could not achieve its GDV, a refinance was declined, or sales did not complete before maturity. These are not surprises. They are foreseeable risks.
When lenders build proactive exit planning into their process, they transform outcomes. By requiring borrowers to evidence sales pipelines, secure refinance offers in principle, or build contingency plans, lenders reduce uncertainty. The result is a loan book with fewer defaults, smoother repayments, and stronger investor confidence.
As we noted in Why Exit Risk Keeps Lenders Awake at Night, repayment is the only true measure of a loan’s success. Proactive exit planning shifts that measure from hope to assurance.
Too often, lenders rely on optimism at inception and attempt to resolve problems only when maturity approaches. This reactive model is costly. Enforcement action consumes months of time, legal fees eat into returns, and capital becomes tied up in distressed assets that cannot be recycled into new lending.
Reactivity also damages reputation. Investors and wholesale funders judge lenders not by gross margins but by repayment reliability. A loan book riddled with defaults deters new funding and reduces market confidence. For challenger banks and specialist lenders, this credibility gap can be fatal.
By contrast, proactive exit planning reassures all stakeholders. Regulators see responsible underwriting. Investors see reliable repayment. Borrowers see lenders who demand realism, but also structure deals that succeed.
Proactive exit planning does not mean rejecting every deal with risk. It means identifying risk early and designing strategies to mitigate it.
For example, a developer planning to refinance onto a buy-to-let mortgage may assume rental yields will meet stress tests. A proactive lender will not take this on trust. They will require evidence of achievable rental income, apply current stress test criteria, and consider whether yields remain viable if interest rates rise. If the plan is marginal, the lender will either adjust terms or insist on contingency exits.
Similarly, where GDV projections drive repayment assumptions, proactive lenders will stress-test values against conservative comparables. If the borrower insists on a £12 million GDV, but market evidence suggests £10.5 million, the facility will be structured against the lower figure. As explored in Navigating Valuation Gaps, this conservatism protects the lender from disappointment later.
Proactivity is not about pessimism. It is about ensuring that if the optimistic case fails, the loan still repays.
In 2022, two regional lenders of similar size pursued very different strategies. Lender A focused on rapid deployment, approving deals quickly with minimal exit scrutiny. Lender B built proactive exit planning into every application, requiring evidence of refinance options and realistic GDVs.
By late 2024, the difference was stark. Lender A’s book showed higher initial returns but carried a 14% default rate, tying up capital and triggering costly enforcement. Lender B’s book, though slower to grow, had a default rate below 3%. Investors viewed Lender B as the more reliable partner, enabling it to raise fresh capital at more competitive terms.
The lesson: loan book performance is not about chasing margins but about ensuring repayment. Proactive exit planning delivers that assurance.
The property finance environment in 2025 is uniquely challenging. Higher interest rates have tightened refinancing criteria. Buyers are more price-sensitive, slowing sales. Overseas borrowers face stricter scrutiny, particularly around currency and AML.
In this context, lenders who approve facilities without robust exit plans are gambling with their loan books. Defaults will not just increase; they will accelerate. By contrast, lenders who demand credible, evidenced, and stress-tested exits will preserve repayment reliability even in volatile markets.
As highlighted in Exits for Borrowers with Complex Income or Overseas Status, some borrowers require specialist structuring that mainstream lenders may overlook. Proactive planning ensures these risks are addressed at inception rather than left to unravel at maturity.
Lenders cannot manage exit risk in isolation. They need brokers who understand market realities, know which lenders have appetite for specific exits, and can structure contingencies. Broker partnerships transform proactive exit planning from a principle into a practice.
In How Lenders Can Reduce Default Risk Through Broker Partnerships, we explored how brokers stress-test borrower assumptions, align expectations, and provide fallback options. For lenders, integrating these partnerships into underwriting is one of the most effective ways to reduce default risk and improve loan book performance.
At Willow Private Finance, we do not just arrange facilities. We design exit strategies that lenders can trust. Our team tests assumptions, builds contingencies, and ensures that every facility we introduce is structured for repayment.
In one recent case, a lender was concerned about a developer’s reliance on refinancing unsold stock. Willow restructured the plan into part-sales and partial refinance, reducing risk and ensuring repayment. The facility performed exactly as expected, strengthening the lender’s loan book.
In another, we supported a private bank lending to an overseas borrower. By structuring income evidence and introducing a fallback Plan B refinance, we gave the bank confidence in repayment. The borrower exited smoothly, and the lender’s reputation for reliability was enhanced.
These are not isolated cases. They demonstrate the core of our approach: proactive planning, conservative structuring, and exits that succeed in the real world.
Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.
We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.

Experience. Integrity. Trust.
About the Author — Wesley Ranger
Wesley Ranger is the Founder and Director of Willow Private Finance. Having worked with lenders and borrowers for over 20 years, he understands how proactive exit planning transforms loan book performance. Wesley specialises in structuring facilities that reduce default risk, enhance repayment reliability, and build lender credibility with investors and regulators.
Important Notice
This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Property finance carries risk, including the risk of default or repossession if loans are not repaid. Exit strategies should be assessed carefully and tailored to individual circumstances. Always seek professional advice before entering into any finance agreement. Willow Private Finance is directly authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN: 588422).
