In 2025, property buyers—especially high-net-worth individuals, entrepreneurs, and international clients—are increasingly asking the same question: Should I use a portfolio credit line or a traditional mortgage to buy UK property? The answer is rarely straightforward. Both options can be powerful, and both have strengths depending on the borrower’s structure, asset profile, and long-term plans.

The landscape of high-value lending has transformed rapidly over the past few years. Traditional affordability tests have become more rigid, which has reduced borrowing capacity for many buyers with bonus-driven compensation, multi-country income, or complex earnings. At the same time, wealthy individuals often hold substantial liquid assets in investment portfolios. Banks have responded by expanding their portfolio-backed credit line offerings, giving clients access to capital without needing to liquidate investments.

Willow Private Finance works at the centre of this shift. Many of our clients want to preserve investment exposure, avoid triggering tax events, or simply move faster than a traditional mortgage allows. Others want the stability and low long-term cost of a mortgage, particularly when borrowing against income that private banks treat generously. Our recent guides on using investment portfolios to buy UK property and how wealthy buyers borrow using assets instead of income highlight just how central asset-based lending has become in today’s market.

This guide compares portfolio credit lines and mortgages in detail, explains how lenders view each structure in 2025, identifies the real-world scenarios where one option is better than the other, and helps buyers understand how to combine both tools effectively.

Market Context in 2025

The financial environment of 2025 is uniquely suited to the rise of portfolio-backed credit lines. Interest rate volatility has softened, but mainstream affordability rules remain tight. Borrowers with fluctuating income, foreign earnings, director’s drawings, performance bonuses, or multi-country income streams often find themselves restricted by traditional underwriting. This is especially true for global buyers acquiring UK property as part of a wider wealth strategy, a topic we explore further in our guide to international buyer requirements.

Meanwhile, investment portfolios have grown substantially in value for many high-net-worth clients, driven by strong market performance in several global sectors. The preference to hold rather than liquidate these assets—combined with increased private-bank appetite for asset-secured lending—has created the perfect environment for portfolio credit lines.

On the mortgage side, the private bank and specialist lender markets remain competitive. These institutions can offer bespoke structures for high-value, low-income clients who don’t meet mainstream affordability rules. Private bank mortgages can stretch far beyond the limits of standard lenders, especially for clients with large holdings, multi-currency income, or valuable portfolios that can be pledged as secondary security.

These trends make 2025 a pivotal year for borrowers evaluating the relative strengths of credit lines versus mortgages.

How Portfolio Credit Lines Work

Portfolio credit lines—sometimes known as liquidity lines or Lombard loans—allow borrowers to unlock capital by borrowing against their investment portfolio without selling the assets. The borrower maintains ownership and stays invested, while the bank provides a flexible funding facility based on the value and composition of the portfolio.

The credit line functions either as a revolving facility, where the borrower draws and repays funds as needed, or as a fixed-term portfolio loan, where the entire amount is drawn upfront for a specific purpose. Either structure can fund property purchases, deposits, renovations, or even stamp duty.

Lenders typically offer credit lines against diversified, liquid portfolios such as equities, bonds, ETFs, and cash-equivalent instruments. They assess risk by evaluating the portfolio’s volatility, asset mix, concentration risk, and jurisdiction. Safer, more diversified portfolios support higher lending multiples.

One of the biggest advantages of a credit line is speed. Private banks can approve and release funds far faster than the timeline for a traditional mortgage. For competitive acquisitions—such as new-build launches, off-market properties, or deals requiring rapid completion—credit lines often give buyers a decisive edge.

Because no assets are liquidated, borrowers avoid crystallising tax events, losing investment exposure, or disrupting long-term wealth strategies. This is especially beneficial for clients whose portfolios are expected to appreciate or who hold assets with complex tax implications.

How Traditional Mortgages Work in the High-Value Space

Mortgages remain the most familiar and widely used form of property finance. In 2025, the mortgage market is divided into three broad segments: mainstream lenders, specialist lenders, and private banks.

Mainstream lenders apply strict affordability criteria, stress-testing income at high interest rates and applying rigid rules around bonus income, foreign currency earnings, and irregular remuneration. Many affluent clients simply do not fit these models, often because their wealth is held in assets rather than income.

Specialist lenders step into more complex territory, offering tailored solutions for UK and international buyers. They consider foreign income, business profits, and more flexible structures, albeit at higher interest rates.

Private banks offer the most bespoke mortgage solutions. They can lend based on the borrower’s overall wealth, asset base, international income streams, and long-term liquidity, often accepting investment portfolios as pledged security to enhance borrowing power. This approach is at the heart of many high-value mortgages discussed in our guide on how wealthy buyers borrow using assets instead of income.

Traditional mortgages can offer lower interest rates than credit lines, particularly for borrowers with strong income or clients who supplement income affordability with asset pledges. Unlike credit lines, mortgages do not involve margin calls, making them more stable over long periods.

What Lenders Are Looking For in 2025

Credit-line underwriting and mortgage underwriting both focus on risk assessment, but they do so in different ways.

For portfolio credit lines, lenders are primarily concerned with:

• Liquidity of the investment portfolio
• Volatility and diversification
• Concentration in high-risk assets
• Jurisdictional considerations
• The borrower’s wider wealth position

They measure how likely it is that the portfolio could fall in value and whether the bank might need to initiate a margin call. Accordingly, low-risk bond portfolios or broad ETF allocations allow for higher LTVs than concentrated single-stock holdings.

For mortgages, lenders—especially private banks—look at:

• Income levels and sustainability
• Global assets and net worth
• Tax residency and international structures
• Property type and long-term plans
• Secondary security (if pledged)

Private banks can be extremely flexible, but they still need to be comfortable that the borrower has a clear long-term repayment strategy.

The Benefits and Drawbacks of Portfolio Credit Lines

Portfolio credit lines offer several strategic advantages. They are fast, flexible, and do not require the borrower to produce extensive income documentation. For clients with significant asset wealth and complex earnings, they often make the difference between securing a deal and missing out entirely.

Borrowers maintain investment exposure, avoiding tax triggers or forced sales during unfavourable market conditions. They also enjoy the ability to redraw funds as needed, making credit lines useful for ongoing obligations such as renovations or additional acquisitions.

However, credit lines involve the risk of margin calls. If the value of the underlying portfolio falls, the borrower may need to add additional collateral or repay part of the loan. Interest rates on credit lines may also be higher than those on a mortgage, particularly for larger, long-term borrowing.

Finally, some lenders require the investment portfolio to be moved under their management, which may not suit all clients.

The Benefits and Drawbacks of Traditional Mortgages

Mortgages offer long-term stability. Interest rates are generally lower than for credit lines, particularly for borrowers using private banks or specialist lenders comfortable with complex profiles. Mortgages also have structured repayment schedules and do not expose borrowers to direct market-volatility risk.

However, mortgages take time. Underwriting can be lengthy, especially for international clients or those with multi-country income streams—a challenge explored in our guide on multi-country income mortgages. Borrowers may also face strict documentation requirements, stress testing, and income verification.

In some cases, a mortgage alone does not provide sufficient borrowing power—particularly for clients with low taxable income but high net worth.

Which Is Better in 2025: Credit Lines or Mortgages?

The best structure depends on the borrower’s goals, wealth profile, timescales, and long-term intentions.

Portfolio credit lines are usually best when:

• Speed is essential
• The borrower wants to avoid selling investments
• Income is complex, irregular, or multi-jurisdictional
• The borrower intends to refinance later
• The buyer is competing for fast-moving or off-market deals

Mortgages are usually best when:

• The borrower has strong or stable income
• Long-term repayment certainty is a priority
• The borrower wants to minimise interest costs
• Margin-call risk is not acceptable
• The borrower is purchasing a property for many years

In many cases, the optimal structure is a combination of both. Borrowers might use a portfolio credit line to fund the deposit or complete the purchase quickly, then refinance into a private-bank mortgage once timelines allow. Others secure a mortgage but use a credit line as a liquidity buffer for additional expenses.

Hypothetical Scenario: Combined Structure for a High-Value Client

Many clients use a hybrid approach in 2025. For example, a buyer with a £7 million investment portfolio may draw a £2 million credit line to complete a purchase rapidly, while arranging a £3 million private-bank mortgage in parallel. The credit line gives them immediate liquidity, while the mortgage provides long-term affordability and cost efficiency.

This dual approach allows the borrower to maintain investment exposure, secure the property without delay, and stabilise their long-term debt position—all while avoiding unnecessary asset liquidation.

Outlook for 2025 and Beyond

Credit-line lending and private-bank mortgages will continue to converge throughout 2025 and into 2026. Borrowers increasingly view these tools not as competing options but as complementary instruments for wealth-efficient property strategies.

We expect to see:

• More integrated mortgage-plus-credit-line packages
• Growing appetite among European and Middle Eastern private banks
• Increased flexibility in accepting offshore assets
• Better terms for low-volatility portfolios
• Higher demand from international family offices

As high-value borrowing becomes more global and more flexible, portfolio-secured facilities will remain a core part of UK property finance strategy.

How Willow Private Finance Can Help

Willow Private Finance works extensively with high-net-worth and international clients using both credit lines and mortgages to finance UK property. We understand how private banks underwrite assets, how to position complex or multi-country income, and how to structure hybrid borrowing models that optimise speed, tax efficiency, and long-term stability.

Our whole-of-market relationships allow us to negotiate bespoke terms, secure strong LTVs, and coordinate complex transactions across multiple banks. Whether you want to use a credit line, a mortgage, or both, we provide tailored advice aligned with your wealth profile and long-term strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Are portfolio credit lines cheaper than mortgages in 2025?
Not usually. Mortgages typically offer lower long-term interest rates. Credit lines are more about flexibility, speed, and liquidity than cost.

Q2: Can I use a credit line to complete a purchase before arranging a mortgage?
Yes. This is common in 2025. Buyers use credit lines for speed, then refinance into a mortgage when time allows.

Q3: Do I need income to qualify for a portfolio credit line?
Income is secondary. Many high-net-worth clients qualify primarily on asset value and stability.

Q4: Are credit lines risky because of market volatility?
They can be. If the portfolio drops in value, the lender may require repayment or additional collateral. Borrowers must understand margin-call rules.

Q5: Which option gives me the most borrowing power?
It depends on your assets and income. For many wealthy clients, the highest borrowing power comes from combining both: a credit line plus a private-bank mortgage.



Q6: Do international buyers use credit lines instead of mortgages?
Yes, frequently. Credit lines offer speed and avoid complex income documentation, making them popular among overseas buyers acquiring UK property.

📞 Want Help Navigating Today’s Market?

Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.

We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.