In 2025, more investors, landlords and business owners are choosing to build property portfolios through special purpose vehicles (SPVs). Company structures offer potential tax advantages, clearer ownership separation and greater long-term planning flexibility. However, to operate effectively, an SPV must be capitalised. It requires funds to acquire assets, pay deposits, manage cash flow and support lender requirements. One of the most powerful ways to achieve this capitalisation is by releasing equity from personally owned property.

Many borrowers underestimate how influential this step is. Using a home or an existing investment property to generate capital for an SPV can unlock a significant amount of financial capability — but the process requires careful planning. It affects personal borrowing power, corporate mortgage capacity, SPV governance, lender appetite, tax considerations and the overall trajectory of the investor’s strategy.

Willow Private Finance frequently works with clients looking to launch or grow company structures using personal assets as the foundation. The interactions between personal lending, SPV structuring and corporate underwriting are sometimes misunderstood. Without clear sequencing and a lender-aligned approach, borrowers risk weakening their borrowing power or restricting the SPV’s long-term capacity. For broader structural context, readers may find it helpful to refer to Incorporating a Property Portfolio in 2025 and Transferring Mortgaged Property Into an SPV, both of which outline the wider considerations around company ownership.

This article examines the lender perspective, the legal framework, the cash-flow implications and the strategic principles involved in using personally owned property to capitalise an SPV in 2025.

Why Borrowers Use Personally Owned Property to Fund SPVs

In 2025, most SPVs begin with limited capital. They are created specifically to operate as “clean” vehicles with no trading history and no complex liabilities. This design benefits lenders, accountants and long-term planning objectives, but it also means the company must be funded externally if it is to acquire its first asset.

Personally owned property — whether a home or an investment — often contains significant equity. Refinancing provides a mechanism for extracting this equity and injecting it into the SPV legally, transparently and efficiently. The funds released can be directed towards deposits, acquisition costs or development capital for new projects. Because company structures require capital under lender rules, equity from personal property is frequently the fastest way to meet these requirements.

Borrowers often find that personal lending criteria allow for higher maximum borrowing than SPV criteria. By refinancing a property in personal name before transferring funds to the SPV, the individual maximises borrowing power and preserves corporate affordability headroom. It is common for lenders to pressure-test SPVs more rigorously than individuals, which makes early personal refinancing a strategic advantage.

The relationship between personal mortgages and corporate structures is therefore not oppositional. When leveraged correctly, they support each other. The home or investment property becomes a foundation for future growth inside the SPV.

How Lenders Assess Equity Release Used for SPV Capitalisation

When using personal property to fund an SPV, the lender’s primary concern is the sustainability and legitimacy of the borrower’s financial position. Lenders want to understand how the refinanced personal mortgage will be serviced, whether the borrower retains sufficient surplus income and whether the SPV’s intended use of funds aligns with long-term financial stability.

In 2025, lenders apply more rigorous affordability assessments than they did in previous years. The cost of borrowing remains elevated compared to the previous decade, and lenders must satisfy regulatory expectations around responsible lending. Refinancing a home or existing buy-to-let to release capital for an SPV is entirely permissible — but the personal affordability must remain strong. Lenders examine income, debt exposure, cash-flow resilience and future commitments to ensure that the refinancing does not create excessive financial strain.

Corporate lenders, on the other hand, assess the capital injected into the SPV as evidence of financial robustness. Cash injections strengthen the company’s balance sheet, making it easier to justify borrowing inside the structure. Lenders view well-capitalised SPVs as more stable borrowers because the company is not entirely dependent on external debt.

This dual perspective — personal affordability and corporate stability — is central to how lenders review refinancing for SPV purposes.

The Importance of Sequencing: Refinancing Before SPV Acquisition

One of the most important decisions borrowers face is the order in which refinancing and SPV purchases occur. In 2025, lenders place significant emphasis on sequencing. The process is not interchangeable. If the borrower releases equity before the SPV acquires property, the personal lending environment is often more favourable. This can increase the size of the loan that can ultimately be injected into the company.

For example, personal residential mortgages often operate under more flexible affordability assumptions than corporate buy-to-let mortgages. If funds are extracted while the property is still in personal ownership, the borrower may be able to secure a higher LTV and a more competitive rate. After funds are injected into the SPV, the company is then free to use this capital as deposit funds for purchasing assets, enabling the SPV to borrow against the new properties under corporate criteria.

Refinancing after incorporation can produce the opposite outcome. Once the borrower uses personal assets to support an SPV purchase, additional personal refinancing may become more challenging. Lenders see the borrower carrying an increased number of commitments linked to corporate borrowing. This reduces personal affordability and restricts future debt capacity.

Effective sequencing ensures that refinancing supports — rather than restricts — the SPV’s long-term goals.

How SPVs Use Personal Equity: Loan, Gift or Share Capital Injection

Once equity is released personally, the next step is to place it into the SPV in a legally appropriate form. The three most common approaches are director’s loans, capital contributions and share subscriptions.

Directors’ loans are typically the most flexible method. Funds loaned to the SPV can be repaid in the future as rental income builds. Borrowers prefer this route when they anticipate long-term growth within the SPV or when they require flexibility to recoup their funds for personal reasons later. Lenders accept director loans as legitimate capitalisation, provided the company remains solvent after the transaction.

Share capital injections create a more permanent form of funding. This method is appropriate when the SPV intends to hold assets for decades or where simplicity and long-term clarity are prioritised. Lenders accept share capital as a demonstration of strong commitment to the structure.

Gifts into the SPV are less common. They require the donor to relinquish beneficial interest with no expectation of repayment. Lenders view gifts cautiously because documentation must confirm that no undisclosed financial obligations remain. For this reason, most refinancing-driven capitalisation uses director loans or share subscriptions rather than gifts.

Regardless of method, lenders look for transparency, proper documentation and evidence that the SPV is properly capitalised before borrowing.

Why Lenders Prefer SPVs to Have Cash Before Applying for Finance

In 2025, lenders consistently express a preference for SPVs that hold identifiable cash reserves. Cash in the company strengthens the profile of the borrower. It demonstrates commitment from the directors, reduces lender exposure and creates a buffer for operational costs.

For example, when an SPV attempts to acquire a buy-to-let property with no cash and relies entirely on mortgage borrowing, lenders may view the structure as highly leveraged and therefore risky. When an SPV has been capitalised through equity released from personal property, the company is demonstrably more stable.

SPV liquidity also influences stress testing. Corporate lenders require evidence that the company can withstand void periods, maintenance costs and interest rate volatility. When the company has tangible funds in place, lender confidence increases.

The use of personal property to create this liquidity remains one of the strongest financing strategies available in 2025.

The Lender Perspective on Risk and Recourse

When a personally owned property is refinanced to inject funds into an SPV, lenders maintain distinct perspectives on risk and recourse depending on which entity holds the debt.

The personal lender relies on the borrower’s income and creditworthiness to judge the sustainability of the new mortgage. They assess whether the borrower is creating undue exposure. Provided income remains strong and the personal property offers adequate security, lenders are generally supportive.

Corporate lenders, meanwhile, rely on personal guarantees from the directors once the SPV begins purchasing property. The cash injected through refinancing becomes part of the SPV’s financial foundation. It strengthens the case for borrowing but also means lenders expect the directors to demonstrate continued financial responsibility.

The two lending processes reinforce each other. Strength on the personal side increases confidence on the corporate side, and capitalisation on the corporate side justifies future lending.

A Hypothetical Example: Using a Home to Launch an SPV

Consider an individual who owns a residential property worth £650,000 with a £200,000 mortgage. They aim to begin building a rental portfolio through an SPV but lack sufficient deposit capital.

The homeowner refinances the property personally, increasing the mortgage to £400,000 at a rate that remains affordable within personal lending criteria. The £200,000 equity released is injected into the SPV through a director’s loan. The SPV now has the capital to acquire multiple buy-to-let properties, which the company finances through separate corporate mortgages.

The personal refinancing supports the SPV’s growth, and the company’s improved balance sheet strengthens lender appetite for future acquisitions.

Outlook for 2025: Capitalisation Remains a Critical Component of SPV Success

In 2025, lenders continue to favour SPVs that are properly capitalised through transparent, well-structured equity injections. Borrowers who attempt to build corporate portfolios without sufficient liquidity face reduced lender appetite, weaker stress-test outcomes and slower growth potential.

Equity release from personally owned property will remain one of the most effective ways to support SPV expansion. For investors who understand the sequencing of refinancing, the legal requirements of capitalisation and the interaction between personal and corporate lending, this strategy provides a powerful foundation for long-term success.

How Willow Private Finance Can Help

Willow Private Finance supports clients in structuring SPVs, refinancing personal properties and securing specialist finance required for corporate growth. The firm works with private banks, specialist lenders and mainstream institutions to ensure that refinancing, capitalisation and acquisitions occur in the correct sequence. By coordinating valuations, lender submissions and solicitor communication, Willow Private Finance ensures that personal assets are leveraged efficiently and safely to build strong, well-capitalised SPVs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Can I use equity from my home to fund an SPV?
Yes. Lenders allow personal refinancing for SPV capitalisation provided affordability remains strong and the structure is correctly documented.

Q2: Should I refinance personally before forming the SPV?
In many cases, yes. Personal refinancing often provides higher borrowing power than corporate refinancing, making sequencing important.

Q3: How does a director’s loan work when injecting funds into an SPV?
A director’s loan is capital provided by the shareholder that can be repaid by the SPV in the future, subject to solvency rules.

Q4: Will lenders require personal guarantees when the SPV borrows?
Yes. SPV lending almost always requires personal guarantees, even when the SPV is capitalised through personal refinancing.



Q5: Can I use equity from an existing buy-to-let to fund an SPV?
Yes. Refinancing a personally owned buy-to-let is a common method for building an SPV’s initial capital base.

📞 Want Help Navigating Today’s Market?

Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.

We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.