The UK remains one of the world’s most attractive real estate markets for international developers, offering a stable legal framework, a mature lending ecosystem, and sustained demand for residential, commercial, and mixed-use development. In 2025, overseas developers continue to play a major role in shaping the UK’s urban landscape, from large regeneration zones to boutique high-end residential projects.

Yet the process of securing development finance as an international sponsor is more complex than for domestic developers. Lenders must address additional layers of risk relating to jurisdiction, governance, taxation, currency exposure, and compliance. While these factors do not deter lenders, they do mean that international borrowers must prepare more intensively, structure their entities with care, and present clear, lender-friendly documentation.

At Willow Private Finance, we regularly work with global developers who have substantial delivery experience in their home markets but are navigating the UK system for the first time. We also support seasoned international groups expanding their UK pipeline. This article outlines how such developers are structuring finance in 2025, what lenders scrutinise most closely, and how to position a cross-border scheme for successful funding.

For additional context on development lending trends, you may also find value in our articles on Phased Development Finance in 2025 and Planning Risk in Development Finance.

Market Context in 2025

International activity in the UK real estate market has remained steadfast despite global economic shifts. Developers from the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America continue to view the UK as a safe market in which to deploy capital, underpinned by transparent regulation, deep liquidity, and strong institutional demand for end products such as build-to-rent, PBSA, and combined-use schemes.

The stabilisation of interest rates and improved visibility over construction costs have reinforced this confidence. Although global volatility still influences decision-making, the UK’s reputation for legal reliability and predictable security enforcement continues to attract international sponsors who want a market where lender relationships are clear and investment structures are enforceable.

Lenders have equally maintained strong appetite for international borrowers, provided the borrower can demonstrate governance, liquidity, and a clear UK-focused delivery plan. The increased sophistication of international capital flows has led lenders to develop specialised underwriting frameworks tailored to cross-border sponsors. In short, international developers are welcome in the UK — but lenders impose higher documentary standards to ensure clarity and enforceability.

Why Lenders Apply Different Standards to International Borrowers

From a lender’s perspective, the primary distinction between domestic and international developers lies not in capability but in complexity. Lending to an overseas sponsor introduces considerations that do not arise when both borrower and project are UK-based.

The first consideration is enforcement. Lenders lending to a UK SPV can rely on familiar legal processes if a borrower defaults. When the ultimate parent company is located abroad, lenders must be certain that any guarantees or undertakings are effective and enforceable across relevant jurisdictions. This requires enhanced legal due diligence and often involves international legal counsel.

The second consideration is anti-money laundering and source-of-funds verification. UK lenders must satisfy strict regulatory obligations, which means they need full visibility over how the developer’s equity is generated, held, and transferred to the UK. For international businesses with diversified revenue streams, this process can take time — so early preparation is essential.

The third consideration is currency. When developer equity originates in USD, EUR, AED, HKD, or other currencies, lenders need to understand how foreign exchange movements might affect the developer’s ability to inject equity or service costs. They do not require hedging, but they require clarity.

None of these factors deter lenders. Instead, they shape the structure an international developer must adopt.

SPV Structures and Legal Frameworks

Almost all lenders require development to be undertaken through a UK-registered Special Purpose Vehicle. This SPV acquires the site, enters into construction contracts, receives loan funds, and grants security to the lender.

International sponsors typically own the SPV either directly or through a holding company in their home jurisdiction. Where the ownership chain extends across multiple jurisdictions, lenders expect to see full corporate documentation and clear evidence of beneficial ownership.

Experienced international developers frequently use group structures that ring-fence each project within its own SPV. This enables lenders to focus on a single asset and isolate risk. For multi-phase schemes, developers sometimes create separate SPVs for each block or tenure, allowing different lenders or institutional partners to fund different phases.

Joint ventures remain a popular model. Many overseas developers create partnerships with UK investors or investment managers who contribute capital or governance experience. Lenders often view JVs positively because they add local oversight and accelerate decision-making within UK regulatory frameworks.

Managing FX Exposure in 2025

Foreign exchange risk is unavoidable when a developer raises equity in one currency but invests in a market denominated in another. Lenders therefore consider how a borrower is planning to manage or absorb such exposure.

Developers injecting capital from USD, EUR, or AED must be able to demonstrate that they have early visibility on transfer timelines, conversion rates, and any restrictions on outbound capital from their home jurisdiction. Some developers use hedging products, while others rely on liquidity strength to absorb fluctuations. The key is that the lender understands the sponsor’s FX approach and is satisfied that adverse market movements will not jeopardise the project.

Currency also affects exit strategy. Developers building for the UK’s private sale market will have a GBP-based exit. Those planning to retain a completed scheme may have rental income denominated in sterling. Lenders want confidence that the developer’s business model accommodates these cashflows, regardless of the currency used for initial equity contributions.

Tax Planning and Cross-Border Considerations

International developers must consider UK tax exposure from multiple directions. Corporation tax obligations for the SPV, VAT treatment on construction contracts, SDLT on land purchases, and capital repatriation planning all influence the developer’s structure.

While lenders do not advise on taxation, they look for clear evidence that the developer has sought specialist tax input and has planned for obligations without eroding liquidity needed for the build. The UK’s network of double-taxation treaties often benefits overseas sponsors, but lenders want confirmation that the developer’s structure is fully compliant.

Tax complexity is rarely a barrier to lending when addressed early. Uncertainty, however, can cause delay — so a well-documented tax position accelerates funding approvals.

Lender Underwriting and Due Diligence

Lenders underwriting an international developer’s project follow a consistent set of principles. They need to be confident in the developer’s experience, financial standing, governance, and practical ability to deliver in the UK context.

Experience is one of the most scrutinised elements. Lenders want evidence that the developer has successfully completed schemes of similar size and complexity. These may be outside the UK, but the lender must be able to verify them independently. Developers expanding into the UK for the first time often strengthen their case by appointing UK-based project managers, contractors, and consultants who bring local expertise.

Equity verification is another priority. Lenders require formal documentation showing the source of equity, liquidity availability, and the route through which funds will be transferred to the SPV. International bank statements, accountant confirmations, and corporate declarations are standard requirements.

Lenders also undertake enhanced AML checks. They must verify identities, trace beneficial ownership, and validate the legitimacy of capital sources. This process can be extensive, but it is essential in satisfying regulatory obligations.

Finally, lenders assess exit strategy. A UK-based exit — whether via private sale, BTR refinance, or institutional acquisition — provides reassurance that repayment will not depend on offshore processes or foreign purchaser appetite.

Funding Strategies Used by International Developers in 2025

International sponsors typically adopt one of three main funding strategies, depending on their capital structure and risk appetite.

The first is senior development finance from a UK lender. This remains the most common route and provides leverage of up to 70–75% of total cost or 55–65% of GDV. International sponsors must demonstrate governance discipline and liquidity strength to secure top-tier lender terms.

The second is the use of stretch senior or mezzanine finance. Developers who wish to reduce their equity input or who lack UK track record often use mezzanine capital to enhance leverage while retaining control of the SPV. Lenders offering these structures are accustomed to working with international sponsors and can often move quickly.

The third is equity partnership. Many international developers have shifted toward joint-venturing with institutional funds, private equity houses, or family offices that want exposure to UK residential or mixed-use development. These equity partners often co-invest directly at SPV level, providing both capital and UK-based oversight that strengthens lender confidence.

Each approach has its own benefits. The most successful international developers are those who select structures that align with their risk profile while presenting lenders with clarity and certainty.

Common Challenges and How Developers Overcome Them

International developers frequently encounter predictable challenges when seeking UK development finance, particularly during their first project. The most common friction points relate to documentation, governance, timing, and compliance.

Cross-border documentation can be slow to obtain. Lenders often require notarised or apostilled documents, corporate resolutions, and tax certificates from multiple jurisdictions. Developers who anticipate these requirements early avoid delays that could derail acquisition timelines.

Equity timing presents another obstacle. Some jurisdictions impose controls on outbound capital transfers, prolonging funding timelines. Lenders are not deterred by this, but they do expect developers to plan the sequencing carefully.

Track record translation can also be challenging. Lenders must verify experience, and not all jurisdictions maintain centralised public registers of completed developments. Providing formal completion certificates, planning documents, and third-party project confirmations greatly improves lender understanding.

Contractor selection can be a concern where developers attempt to import overseas contractors who lack UK experience. Lenders prefer UK-based contractors familiar with UK regulations, warranty frameworks, and procurement routes.

Planning unfamiliarity is perhaps the most underestimated challenge. The UK planning system’s complexity often surprises international developers. Lenders want realistic timelines, condition discharge plans, and clear consultant coordination.

Developers who address these issues proactively present lenders with confidence rather than caution.

Best Practices in 2025

The international developers achieving the best funding outcomes in 2025 share several common practices. They establish their UK SPV structure early and secure all necessary corporate documentation in advance. They ensure that their project has UK-based oversight through experienced consultants and contractors. They prepare detailed feasibility studies with clear costings, value analysis, and exit planning. They present AML and KYC documentation clearly and promptly. And crucially, they engage lenders early rather than allowing structure and documentation issues to build unnoticed.

These best practices do not simply improve the chances of funding; they accelerate it, improve leverage, and generate more competitive pricing.

Outlook for 2025 and Beyond

The international developer landscape in the UK is expected to expand further over the coming years. With increasing institutional appetite for BTR, PBSA, and mixed-use assets, the UK continues to offer long-term stability for overseas sponsors. Continued refinement of cross-border lending frameworks will make it easier for lenders to onboard international borrowers while satisfying regulatory obligations.

Developers who embrace transparency, governance, and strong UK-based delivery teams will remain highly sought-after in the lender community, securing competitive and flexible development finance across the capital stack.

How Willow Private Finance Can Help

Willow Private Finance specialises in structuring development finance for international developers operating in the UK market. We understand the additional layers of complexity international sponsors face, including cross-border compliance, FX exposure, tax considerations, SPV governance, and equity verification.

Our team works with private banks, specialist lenders, challenger lenders, mezzanine funds, and institutional investors to secure senior debt, stretch senior facilities, mezzanine funding, and equity partnerships for cross-border projects. Whether you are entering the UK for the first time or scaling an established portfolio, we can help you build a finance structure that lenders understand and approve with confidence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do UK lenders support international developers in 2025?
Yes. Lender appetite is strong when sponsors present clear structures, transparent ownership, and UK-based delivery teams.

Do international sponsors need a UK partner?
Not always, though many lenders prefer the presence of UK-based oversight or JV governance.

How do lenders manage FX exposure?
They assess the developer’s currency strategy and how fluctuations may affect equity commitments or exit proceeds.

Are offshore SPVs acceptable?
Only at parent level. The borrowing entity must be a UK SPV.



How does Willow Private Finance support cross-border developers?
We structure SPVs, manage lender onboarding, align FX and tax considerations, and secure senior, mezzanine, or equity partners.

📞 Want Help Navigating Today’s Market?

Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.

We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.