In 2025, the gap between how high-street banks and specialist lenders assess director income has never been wider. Business owners who approach the wrong lender often find themselves declined, under-assessed, or told that they “only earn £12,570”—even when their company generates six- or seven-figure profits. These outdated interpretations continue to frustrate directors who run profitable, tax-efficient companies but are penalised simply because they take small salaries or modest dividends.
At the same time, specialist lenders and private banks have redesigned underwriting to reflect the realities of modern business ownership. Instead of relying solely on tax returns, these lenders look at company performance, retained earnings, liquidity, net profit, and the director’s true economic capacity to draw income without weakening the company. This evolution mirrors the shift seen across related areas of the market, including the growing focus on profit-based underwriting explored in
Directors’ Remuneration & Retained Profits: Smarter Borrowing for Ltd Company Owners in 2025.
Understanding which lenders assess income properly is critical for business owners, especially those using SPVs, managing multiple companies, or preparing for future investments. As highlighted in
Mortgages for Self-Employed Borrowers, presenting the correct financial picture can be the difference between a limited offer and a highly competitive deal.
This guide explains how high-street lenders assess director income, how specialist lenders differ, and why business owners must choose their lender carefully in 2025.
Market Context in 2025
The structure of business-owner underwriting is evolving rapidly. High-street banks continue to rely on personal tax returns, largely ignoring the way modern owner-managed companies retain profit, reinvest earnings, and operate through tax-efficient structures. Their affordability assessments remain tied to salary, dividends, and two full years of accounts.
Meanwhile, specialist lenders now recognise that directors rarely extract their true earning potential from the company. Many owners leave substantial retained earnings for growth, stability, or future reinvestment. As economic conditions stabilise and competition increases among lenders, more institutions are offering dynamic underwriting that focuses on actual company performance rather than drawings.
This divergence has created a two-tier lending market: one based on rigid, outdated income interpretation and another built around commercial logic and genuine affordability.
How High-Street Lenders Assess Director Income
High-street lenders remain the most conservative option for business owners. Their underwriting standards typically follow a narrow, inflexible pattern that assumes personal drawings reflect true income. Most assess affordability using salary and dividends declared on the tax return, often requiring two full years of coherent, stable figures. If the director chooses to take a low salary for tax reasons, the high-street lender simply records low income.
This approach can significantly understate a director’s capacity to repay a mortgage. High-street banks rarely consider retained earnings, net profit, director’s loan balances, or the company’s underlying strength. Even in situations where profits have increased sharply, many insist on averaging two years’ income—penalising growth and ignoring momentum.
For established businesses with straightforward structures, this may be suitable. But for directors using SPVs, operating multiple companies, or retaining profit within the business, the high-street model often creates artificial affordability caps. Borrowing power is limited not by economic reality, but by the lender’s methodology.
How Specialist Lenders Assess Director Income Differently
Specialist lenders have stepped into the gap left by high-street institutions by focusing on the economic substance of the business rather than the director’s tax strategy. Instead of focusing on drawings, they evaluate the company’s actual ability to generate and support personal income.
A specialist lender will review net profit, retained earnings, multi-year performance trends, liquidity, and the operational sustainability of the company. They are often willing to use the latest year of accounts when profits are rising, rather than averaging across previous years. This aligns with the more flexible underwriting seen in
Short-Term Property Finance: Your Options and other business-sensitive finance products.
Where the high-street model sees a director earning £20,000 salary plus £15,000 dividends, the specialist model sees a profitable company capable of supporting significantly higher income if required. They assess affordability through financial capacity rather than extraction.
For complex structures—such as multiple SPVs, trading companies, and consolidated groups—these lenders can often assess the wider financial picture rather than isolating the director’s personal draws. This is particularly relevant for portfolio landlords and investors who rely on company performance rather than PAYE income.
Why This Matters for Business Owners in 2025
The difference between lender types is not academic—it directly affects borrowing power. A director with £40,000 in drawings but £300,000 in annual profit may find their borrowing capped at a modest level by a high-street lender, whereas a specialist lender may use the full profit figure to assess affordability. The gap can equate to hundreds of thousands of pounds in borrowing capacity.
In a market where more investors are incorporating portfolios, creating SPVs, or acquiring additional assets, this difference can shape long-term strategy. It also affects remortgages, equity release, and refinancing. A lender who misunderstands the income structure risks declining a perfectly viable case.
Directors who rely solely on high-street lenders often underestimate their borrowing power. Those who use the correct lender type gain access to far more realistic—often significantly higher—loan sizes.
Challenges Directors Commonly Face
Business owners often encounter misunderstandings from both lenders and inexperienced brokers. Many are mistakenly advised that their borrowing is capped by their tax return alone. This misunderstanding can lead to reduced loan offers, unnecessary restructuring, wasted credit checks, or failed purchases.
Directors with multiple companies may face further complexity, as high-street lenders struggle to interpret their income between entities. Some lenders cannot process retained earnings as income, even where substantial reserves exist. Others refuse to consider financials from sister companies or holding companies, leading to an inaccurate affordability assessment.
The challenge is rarely the business itself. The challenge is presenting financial strength to a lender who understands it.
How Business Owners Should Approach Lender Selection in 2025
For directors, choosing the right lender is as important as choosing the right property. In 2025, business owners should prioritise lenders who assess:
- full profit rather than limited drawings
- retained earnings rather than only declared dividends
- the capacity to draw income rather than actual extraction
- consolidated group profitability in multi-company structures
- the commercial stability of the business
- liquidity, resilience, and long-term sustainability
Where the borrower’s business is growing, specialist lenders or private banks may prove especially valuable, as they can use the most recent financial year or adjusted profit figures. This creates a fairer, more accurate representation of affordability—and ensures that tax-efficient planning does not restrict long-term investment potential.
Hypothetical Scenario
A company director takes a £12,570 salary and £20,000 in dividends but operates a business generating £240,000 net profit with strong liquidity. A high-street lender assesses £32,570 of income and offers limited borrowing. A specialist lender instead assesses affordability using the £240,000 profit figure and offers substantially higher borrowing on a more flexible basis. This scenario is typical among director-owned companies across the UK.
Outlook for 2025 and Beyond
As the divide between lender types continues to widen, directors in 2025 must be more strategic with lender selection. High-street lenders remain the most cautious option and may suit straightforward employment-style income. But for business owners, dynamic underwriting is often essential to unlocking the full potential of their income.
Specialist lenders and private banks will continue to evolve in this space, providing more flexible assessments, higher borrowing power, and underwriting that reflects the realities of modern business structures. For directors, the lender you choose increasingly defines the outcome you achieve.
How Willow Private Finance Can Help
Willow Private Finance works extensively with directors, entrepreneurs, SPV owners, and complex business structures. As a whole-of-market broker, Willow identifies the lenders who understand company performance, retained earnings, liquidity, and profit-derived income. This ensures that business owners are assessed based on genuine affordability—not their tax strategy.
Whether sourcing a high-value mortgage, a term loan, or a specialist facility, Willow positions your financials with the right lenders to maximise borrowing power and avoid the limitations of outdated income interpretation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Why do high-street lenders ignore retained earnings?
High-street lenders rely on tax returns, so they only assess income already drawn. Retained earnings fall outside their affordability model.
Q2: Do specialist lenders assess profit instead of drawings?
Yes. Many specialist lenders use net profit and retained earnings to determine true affordability, not the limited figures on a personal tax return.
Q3: Can I use only my latest year of accounts?
Often yes. Several specialist lenders accept the latest year only, particularly where profits have increased significantly.
Q4: Will lenders assess income across multiple companies?
Some will. Specialist lenders and private banks can assess consolidated group profit or cross-company structures.
Q5: Why is my borrowing so low with a high-street bank?
Because they assess only salary and dividends, which understate your real income if you operate through a tax-efficient structure.
Q6: Should directors use specialist lenders instead of high-street banks?
In many cases, yes—especially where the business retains profit or uses complex structures.
📞 Want Help Navigating Today’s Market?
Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.
We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.
