For family offices, estate planning is rarely a single event. It is a long-term process that balances control, liquidity, tax efficiency, and family dynamics across generations. Property often sits at the centre of this equation, particularly where prime and ultra-prime residential assets have been held for decades and form a core part of family identity as well as wealth.

Traditionally, these assets were transferred through straightforward succession planning: inheritance, trusts, or gifting strategies designed to minimise tax and preserve ownership. Debt was often viewed as a complication—something to be avoided in favour of clean, unencumbered balance sheets.

In 2025, that thinking has evolved. Family offices are increasingly recognising that property-backed debt can be a powerful estate planning tool when used deliberately. Rather than undermining succession, carefully structured borrowing can enhance it—providing liquidity, equalising inheritances, reducing forced-sale risk, and enabling smoother generational transitions.

Willow Private Finance works closely with family offices, private banks, and professional advisors to structure property finance solutions that support succession planning while preserving discretion, flexibility, and long-term asset integrity.

Why Succession Planning Creates a Liquidity Challenge

One of the central challenges in estate planning is liquidity. Property-rich families are often asset-heavy but cash-light, particularly where wealth is concentrated in prime residential real estate that produces limited income.

Succession events—whether triggered by death, retirement, or generational restructuring—often create immediate financial pressures. These may include inheritance tax liabilities, equalisation between beneficiaries, or the need to fund buyouts where not all heirs wish to retain property exposure.

Without access to liquidity, families are frequently forced into suboptimal decisions: selling core assets, rushing transactions, or accepting unfavourable terms simply to meet timing requirements. For ultra-prime property, where transaction periods can be long and buyer pools narrow, this risk is amplified.

Strategic borrowing against property allows family offices to separate liquidity needs from asset ownership, preserving long-term holdings while meeting short-term obligations.

How Property Debt Supports Modern Estate Planning

In a family office context, debt is increasingly viewed as a planning instrument rather than a liability. When introduced conservatively, property-backed borrowing can solve several succession challenges simultaneously.

One common use is funding inheritance tax or estate equalisation without selling assets. Rather than fragmenting a property portfolio or disposing of legacy homes, families can borrow against retained assets, spreading repayment over time while maintaining control.

Debt can also support generational restructuring. As assets move from founders to next-generation vehicles or trusts, borrowing can provide liquidity to exiting family members or fund new investment mandates for younger generations without destabilising the balance sheet.

Importantly, lenders are comfortable with these objectives when clearly articulated. Facilities linked to succession planning are often viewed as lower risk than opportunistic borrowing, particularly where leverage remains modest and governance is strong.

Lender Attitudes to Succession-Driven Borrowing

Private banks and specialist lenders are increasingly familiar with succession-led borrowing strategies. In 2025, many lenders actively support facilities designed around estate planning, provided structures are transparent and professionally advised.

Underwriting focuses on asset quality, leverage discipline, and clarity of purpose. Prime residential property held within well-governed family structures is typically seen as strong collateral, particularly when the borrowing objective is preservation rather than speculation.

Lenders also assess continuity. Clear governance frameworks, decision-making authority, and long-term asset plans reduce perceived risk. Facilities that align with trust structures or family investment vehicles are often more attractive than ad hoc arrangements.

Where borrowing supports intergenerational transfer rather than lifestyle expenditure, lender appetite is generally strong.

Typical Structures Used by Family Offices

Succession-related property finance is rarely standardised. Facilities are bespoke, designed to integrate with legal and tax planning rather than operate independently.

Common structures include interest-only loans secured against one or more prime assets, often at conservative loan-to-value ratios of 30–50%. Lower leverage supports longer tenors, reduces refinancing pressure, and reassures both lenders and family stakeholders.

In portfolio contexts, families may use multiple properties to support a single facility, smoothing risk and improving terms. This can be particularly effective where assets vary in liquidity or jurisdiction.

In many cases, borrowing is paired with long-term planning to reduce or refinance debt over time, ensuring that leverage does not burden future generations unnecessarily.

Managing Intergenerational Fairness

One of the most sensitive aspects of succession is fairness between beneficiaries. Property portfolios are often indivisible, and not all heirs share the same appetite for real estate exposure.

Debt can be used to equalise outcomes. By borrowing against retained property, families can provide liquidity to beneficiaries who prefer cash or diversified investments, while allowing others to retain long-term ownership of core assets.

This approach reduces conflict and avoids forced asset sales driven by family dynamics rather than strategy. It also preserves optionality for future restructuring as family circumstances evolve.

Cross-Border Considerations in Estate Planning Finance

Many family offices hold property across multiple jurisdictions, introducing complexity to both estate planning and borrowing. Legal systems, inheritance rules, and tax regimes vary widely, and debt structures must align carefully with these frameworks.

In cross-border cases, lenders require robust legal opinions and clarity on ownership and succession mechanics. Currency exposure is also assessed, particularly where liabilities and assets are denominated differently.

Early coordination between finance, legal, and tax advisors is critical. Poor sequencing—such as arranging borrowing before finalising estate structures—can create unnecessary friction or limit lender options.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

A frequent mistake is treating property finance as an afterthought in estate planning. When borrowing is bolted on late, it can conflict with trust structures or tax strategies, reducing effectiveness.

Another pitfall is excessive leverage. While debt can support succession, over-borrowing risks transferring financial strain to the next generation, undermining the very objectives the strategy was meant to achieve.

Finally, lack of communication within families can derail even well-structured plans. Successful succession-driven borrowing is as much about governance and transparency as it is about financial engineering.

How Willow Private Finance Supports Succession Planning

Willow Private Finance works with family offices to design property-backed lending strategies that integrate seamlessly with estate planning objectives. We operate independently across private banks and specialist lenders, allowing us to structure facilities based on long-term family strategy rather than lender convenience.

Our approach is collaborative. We work alongside legal and tax advisors to ensure borrowing supports succession, preserves asset integrity, and maintains flexibility across generations. Whether funding inheritance tax, equalising beneficiaries, or restructuring ownership, our focus is on durable, low-risk solutions.

Looking Ahead: Debt as a Succession Tool, Not a Risk

In 2025 and beyond, property-backed debt will continue to play a growing role in sophisticated estate planning. For family offices, the question is no longer whether debt belongs in succession planning, but how to use it responsibly.

When structured conservatively and aligned with long-term governance, borrowing can enhance control, reduce friction, and protect family wealth across generations—without compromising the legacy embedded in prime property assets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Why do family offices use property debt in estate planning?
Debt provides liquidity without forcing asset sales, helping families manage tax liabilities, equalise beneficiaries, and preserve long-term ownership.

Q2: Is borrowing risky for succession planning?
Risk depends on structure and leverage. Conservative borrowing aligned with long-term strategy is commonly used and well understood by lenders.

Q3: What loan-to-value ratios are typical for succession-driven borrowing?
Most family offices borrow at 30–50% LTV to maintain flexibility and protect future generations.

Q4: Can debt help avoid selling family properties?
Yes. Borrowing against retained assets can meet liquidity needs while preserving core holdings.



Q5: Do lenders support estate planning–led borrowing?
Yes, provided objectives are clear, governance is strong, and professional advice is evident.

📞 Want Help Navigating Today’s Market?

Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.

We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.