How Borrowers Use Corporate and Offshore Structures to Optimise High-Value Lending

Wesley Ranger • 21 October 2025

Why sophisticated borrowers use SPVs, trusts, and offshore entities to secure smarter lending outcomes

Structuring Sophisticated Finance for Complex Wealth


In the world of high-value property and investment finance, structure is everything. For high-net-worth (HNW) and ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) borrowers, the way capital and assets are organised can determine not only how a deal is executed, but how efficiently it performs for years to come.


Corporate and offshore entities — from UK special purpose vehicles (SPVs) to family trusts and international holding companies — have long been used to hold and manage wealth. But in 2025, these structures have evolved far beyond tax planning. They are now essential instruments for accessing liquidity, protecting assets, and aligning global wealth strategies with increasingly sophisticated lending markets.


While the benefits are substantial, so too is the complexity. Lenders must look beyond the borrower’s personal profile and understand the architecture of ownership behind each transaction. For the borrower, success depends on achieving the right balance: transparency where required, discretion where appropriate, and clarity throughout.

This article explores how private clients are structuring finance through corporate and offshore vehicles, what lenders are truly looking for, and how to build a structure that supports both control and opportunity.


The Shift to Structured Borrowing


A decade ago, most property finance was taken in personal names or simple partnerships. That world has changed. Today, at loan sizes between £5 million and £100 million, structured borrowing is the norm rather than the exception.


The shift has been driven by three powerful forces. The first is risk segregation: borrowers want to ringfence liabilities so that one project’s performance does not endanger an entire portfolio. The second is tax and estate planning, as wealth becomes multi-jurisdictional and succession planning demands flexibility. The third is operational efficiency, allowing multiple investors, family members, or funds to participate under a single legal and financial framework.


In short, borrowers no longer ask, “Can I borrow?” but rather, “How should I borrow?”


Special Purpose Vehicles: The Building Blocks of Modern Lending


At the heart of structured borrowing sits the SPV — a limited company created to hold a single property, project, or series of investments. Its purpose is simple but powerful: to isolate each transaction from wider financial interests.

Lenders view SPVs favourably because they provide clean, self-contained financial statements. The accounts tell one story — the asset, the debt, and the projected performance. That clarity streamlines underwriting and ensures that the lender’s security and exposure are easily defined.


For developers and family offices, SPVs offer practical advantages too. Ownership can be transferred through share sales, profits can be distributed efficiently via dividends, and risk is limited to the specific project. In 2025, many borrowers now form an SPV for every acquisition or development, a practice once reserved for institutional investors but now widely used in private markets.


However, lenders do not stop at the company’s nameplate. They examine who ultimately controls it — the beneficial ownership, source of funds, and corporate governance behind it. Transparency is key, and borrowers must be prepared to demonstrate both legitimate purpose and a coherent financial strategy.


Offshore Companies: Efficiency, Not Evasion


Offshore vehicles — often established in jurisdictions such as Jersey, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, or the British Virgin Islands — are among the most misunderstood tools in global finance. Their use is rarely about secrecy. It is about neutrality and efficiency.


Offshore companies allow international investors to hold and finance assets in stable, tax-neutral environments. For a borrower based in the Middle East, Asia, or continental Europe, an offshore structure can simplify the ownership of UK property or European investments, align currency and tax treatment, and support cross-border lending arrangements.


In 2025, lenders are entirely comfortable with offshore structures — provided they are transparent and professionally managed. The days of opaque shell entities are gone. Instead, private lenders now expect full documentation: articles of association, registers of directors and shareholders, and identification of ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs).


What matters most is governance. An offshore company managed by a regulated fiduciary with proper accounting, insurance, and compliance oversight will often command lender confidence equal to — or greater than — a domestic entity.


Trusts and Foundations: The Architecture of Legacy


Trusts remain the cornerstone of wealth preservation for many UHNW families. They allow assets to be held for future generations under the control of trustees, protecting them from fragmentation or exposure.


In lending, a trust typically operates as the ultimate owner rather than the borrower itself. The borrower is usually a company held by the trust, which applies for finance secured on the underlying property or investments. Lenders therefore assess not only the borrowing entity but the trust’s authority to borrow, grant security, and guarantee obligations.


The key issue is clarity. A well-drafted trust deed and trustee resolution can make the difference between an approved facility and a declined one. Increasingly, lenders are comfortable working with regulated trust companies that administer these arrangements — especially when supported by clear legal opinions confirming enforceability.


When used correctly, trusts and foundations bring stability to lending. They align with estate planning goals while allowing capital to flow when needed, bridging generational and jurisdictional divides.


How Lenders Evaluate Structured Borrowing


In today’s market, private banks and credit funds are no strangers to corporate and offshore frameworks. However, their approach is methodical. Before extending credit, they want to see a clear and auditable ownership chain, with every entity serving a defined purpose.


They examine whether the borrower has the legal authority to take on debt, charge its assets, and sign guarantees. They assess jurisdictional risk, preferring well-regulated territories such as Jersey or Luxembourg where enforcement is straightforward and legal systems align with UK principles.


Tax and withholding considerations are also central. Cross-border transactions can introduce frictional costs if not structured properly, and lenders expect borrowers to have professional tax advice in place before completion.

Perhaps most importantly, lenders seek comfort on exit strategy. Whether the repayment will come through refinance, sale, or group restructuring, it must be achievable within the confines of the structure. Private lenders, in particular, emphasise security control — through share pledges, floating charges, or director undertakings — ensuring that their ability to recover funds is preserved, regardless of how the borrower’s entities are layered.


Why Private Credit Dominates This Space


Private credit has transformed structured lending. Unlike traditional banks, private lenders are not constrained by rigid affordability models or slow-moving credit committees. They can evaluate risk pragmatically, often completing large and complex transactions within weeks.


For UHNW borrowers, this flexibility is invaluable. Private lenders understand that wealth can be illiquid, globally dispersed, and held within intricate frameworks. They view structure not as a barrier but as a sign of sophistication — an indication that the borrower takes governance and risk management seriously.


The result is a new generation of bespoke lending, where speed, confidentiality, and strategic alignment take precedence over box-ticking bureaucracy.


Navigating Compliance and Transparency in 2025


While structured lending offers flexibility, it operates within a landscape of heightened regulation. The OECD’s Common Reporting Standard (CRS), the UK’s Beneficial Ownership Register, and global AML frameworks have collectively made transparency unavoidable.


This is not a disadvantage — it is simply the new baseline for responsible lending. Borrowers who prepare in advance by maintaining updated corporate records, certified ownership registers, and clear source-of-funds documentation will find that deals progress far more smoothly.


At Willow Private Finance, many of our private clients maintain pre-cleared compliance packs with their fiduciary or legal advisors, allowing us to engage lenders swiftly. The message from 2025’s lending environment is clear: transparency is not the opposite of discretion; it is its enabler.


How Willow Private Finance Supports Structured Borrowers


At Willow Private Finance, we specialise in arranging finance for borrowers with sophisticated ownership structures. Our role extends beyond introducing lenders — we interpret, translate, and structure complexity into clarity.


We work with a global network of private banks, credit funds, and fiduciary partners to ensure that every element — from SPV creation to cross-border documentation — supports your objectives. Whether you are acquiring, refinancing, or releasing liquidity from within a trust or corporate group, we deliver lending that is discreet, efficient, and precisely tailored to your structure.


Frequently Asked Questions


Why do UHNW borrowers use corporate or offshore structures?

Corporate and offshore structures allow borrowers to manage risk, protect assets, and align their lending with broader wealth and estate planning strategies. By holding assets within entities such as SPVs, offshore companies, or trusts, borrowers can isolate liabilities, streamline ownership, and create flexibility in how capital is deployed or repaid. These structures are not about secrecy — they are about control, efficiency, and long-term stability.


Are lenders comfortable with offshore companies and trusts?

Yes. In 2025, private credit funds and specialist banks regularly lend to offshore entities and trusts, provided they are transparent, professionally administered, and fully compliant with AML and KYC regulations. Lenders will want to verify beneficial ownership, understand governance arrangements, and confirm that the entity has the legal authority to borrow. When those conditions are met, offshore structures are widely accepted.


Can a trust or foundation borrow directly?

It depends on the trust deed and jurisdiction. In most cases, a trust will not borrow directly but will own a company that does. The trustees then authorise the company to take on borrowing and grant security over the trust’s property. Lenders will require clear resolutions from trustees confirming that the borrowing is permitted and properly executed. When managed by a regulated fiduciary, this process is smooth and straightforward.


What documentation do lenders require for structured borrowing?

Lenders typically require certified copies of corporate documents, proof of tax residency, registers of directors and shareholders, and evidence of ultimate beneficial ownership. They will also ask for legal opinions confirming that the borrowing entity has the power to enter into the loan and grant security. Source-of-funds verification and AML documentation are mandatory for every layer of the structure.


How do corporate and offshore structures affect loan pricing and terms?

When the structure is clear, compliant, and professionally managed, it rarely increases cost. In fact, some private lenders prefer structured borrowers because governance and documentation reduce their underwriting risk. However, poorly maintained entities, unclear ownership chains, or jurisdictions with low regulatory oversight can create delays or additional due diligence requirements.


How can Willow Private Finance assist with structured lending?

Willow Private Finance works with a network of private lenders, credit funds, and fiduciary administrators who specialise in complex structures. We ensure that the lending process is efficient, compliant, and fully aligned with your objectives. From preparing the documentation to coordinating lender approvals, our role is to manage the complexity — so you can focus on the bigger picture of your portfolio strategy.


📞 Considering a Corporate or Offshore Lending Structure?


Book a confidential strategy call with one of ou
r private client specialists.
We’ll help you navigate complexity and design a finance solution aligned with your goals.

About the Author


Wesley Ranger


Wesley Ranger is a senior property finance specialist and Director at Willow Private Finance, where he leads the Private Client division. With more than 15 years’ experience structuring bespoke lending for high-net-worth individuals, developers, and family offices, Wesley is recognised for his deep understanding of complex finance, private credit, and cross-border wealth structures.


Throughout his career, Wesley has worked at the intersection of private banking, development finance, and structured credit, helping clients secure large-scale funding where conventional routes fall short. His expertise includes corporate and offshore lending, strategic refinancing, and the use of alternative assets as collateral.


At Willow Private Finance, he advises clients globally on intelligent debt strategy — ensuring that lending supports not just transactions, but long-term wealth and succession goals.







Compliance Statement

This article is provided by Willow Private Finance Ltd, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA No. 588422). The content is for general information only and should not be considered as financial, tax, or legal advice.

All lending is subject to status, valuation, and lender criteria. Terms, rates, and structures vary according to individual circumstances and market conditions. Borrowing through corporate or offshore structures involves regulatory, legal, and tax complexities. You should seek independent professional advice before proceeding.

Willow Private Finance accepts no responsibility for loss arising from reliance on this material. For advice tailored to your objectives, please contact one of our private client specialists.

by Wesley Ranger 21 October 2025
A complete 2025 guide for high-net-worth investors, family offices, and developers on structuring £10M–£150M+ property finance—covering private credit, syndication, bridging, and strategic debt.
by Wesley Ranger 21 October 2025
Learn how high-net-worth and UHNW individuals use strategic leverage in 2025 to strengthen wealth planning, enhance liquidity, and create long-term capital efficiency.
by Wesley Ranger 21 October 2025
HNW and UHNW borrowers can unlock liquidity from property in 2025 without selling core assets. Learn how private credit, cross-collateralisation, and structured facilities work—and what lenders look for.
by Wesley Ranger 21 October 2025
How family-owned property developers in 2025 can maintain lender confidence and borrowing power during generational transitions through structure, governance, and communication.
by Wesley Ranger 21 October 2025
Learn the difference between Loan-to-Cost (LTC) and Loan-to-Value (LTV) in large-scale property finance, and how each metric shapes leverage, risk, and negotiation in 2025.
by Wesley Ranger 21 October 2025
How high-net-worth developers and family offices are using private placement debt in 2025 to fund large-scale property projects discreetly and efficiently.
Show More