When assessing a property investment or development opportunity, it is tempting to focus solely on the headline numbers—interest rates, monthly repayments, or the speed of completion. However, professional investors and developers know that lenders look beyond these surface figures. In 2025, three fundamental metrics continue to determine whether a deal gets approved, how much funding you can secure, and on what terms.

These are the Loan to Value (LTV), Loan to Cost (LTC), and Gross Development Value (GDV) ratios. Together, they reveal how much capital risk a lender is taking on, how much equity the borrower has in the project, and how profitable the final exit is likely to be. Understanding these numbers—and how they work together—is one of the defining skills of a successful property investor.

Loan to Value (LTV): Measuring Security and Leverage

The Loan to Value ratio measures the relationship between the amount borrowed and the current or purchase value of the property. In its simplest form, it is calculated by dividing the loan amount by the property value and multiplying by 100. For example, if you are purchasing a property worth £400,000 with a loan of £300,000, the LTV is 75 per cent.

Lenders rely on LTV to assess the risk they are taking in the event that the property value falls. A higher LTV means less equity buffer for the lender, making the loan inherently riskier. As a result, products with higher LTVs typically come with higher interest rates or tighter conditions. Conversely, borrowers with lower LTVs—meaning they are contributing more of their own capital—often benefit from lower pricing and more flexible terms.

In 2025, most mainstream buy-to-let and residential lenders continue to cap LTVs around 75 to 80 per cent, depending on the borrower profile, income verification, and property type. Specialist and private lenders may stretch beyond this for strong applicants, particularly those with significant net worth or demonstrable experience in managing leveraged property assets.

The LTV ratio remains especially critical in refinancing scenarios, where lenders look at both the original loan balance and the current market valuation to determine whether equity has increased or eroded. Even a modest shift in valuation can change your LTV band and alter the finance options available.

Loan to Cost (LTC): Assessing Developer Commitment

While LTV focuses on property value, Loan to Cost—LTC—looks at the total cost of the project. This metric is primarily used in development and refurbishment finance, where total project expenditure includes land acquisition, professional fees, materials, and construction costs.

LTC is calculated by dividing the total loan amount by the total project cost, expressed as a percentage. Suppose a developer undertakes a project with a total cost of £1 million and borrows £700,000. The resulting LTC is 70 per cent.

This ratio provides a crucial insight into how much “skin in the game” the developer has. A lower LTC suggests that the borrower is contributing a greater share of their own capital, reducing the lender’s exposure. A high LTC indicates a more leveraged structure and, therefore, greater risk to the lender if costs overrun or the project underperforms.

In the 2025 lending environment, most lenders remain comfortable with LTCs between 60 and 75 per cent. However, experienced developers with proven track records, credible contractors, and strong exit plans may secure higher leverage—particularly where the location and resale prospects are robust.

Lenders also use LTC as an indicator of discipline. Projects funded with little borrower equity can signal overreliance on debt, making lenders wary of the borrower’s financial resilience if delays occur. Conversely, well-capitalised developers often find that lower LTCs help them negotiate faster completions, reduced fees, and more favourable drawdown structures.

Gross Development Value (GDV): Predicting the Exit

The third—and perhaps most strategic—metric is the Gross Development Value (GDV). This represents the estimated market value of the completed development or refurbishment once all works are finished. Unlike LTV or LTC, GDV is not a fixed calculation but a valuation-based assessment derived from comparable local sales, market demand, and professional appraisal.

GDV matters because it defines the project’s future profitability and, crucially, determines how lenders assess the viability of your exit strategy. If you plan to sell the property upon completion, the GDV indicates the expected sales proceeds. If you intend to refinance, it helps lenders gauge the sustainable long-term value of the asset.

In 2025, most development finance providers cap lending at around 65 to 70 per cent of GDV. Even if your LTC is lower, this cap will often determine your maximum borrowing limit. Lenders are acutely aware that property markets can fluctuate, and a conservative GDV limit protects both borrower and lender against valuation risk.

A realistic GDV assessment, backed by independent comparables, not only supports a smoother underwriting process but also signals professional competence. Inflated GDVs, on the other hand, are one of the fastest ways to derail a funding application. Most lenders will run their own valuation checks, and discrepancies between your estimate and theirs will raise questions about credibility and risk awareness.

How LTV, LTC, and GDV Interact

Although each ratio has a distinct purpose, lenders rarely assess them in isolation. A well-structured finance application considers all three in tandem. Bridging loans, for example, are heavily asset-backed, so lenders prioritise the LTV. Development finance strikes a balance between LTC and GDV, while refurbishment loans often incorporate both the LTV at purchase and the GDV upon completion.

Consider a development scenario where land is purchased for £200,000, construction costs amount to £400,000, and the expected sale value is £900,000. A loan of £450,000 produces an LTC of 75 per cent and a GDV of 50 per cent. These ratios fall comfortably within the thresholds most lenders would consider healthy in 2025.

By analysing these figures together, lenders can form a complete picture of the project’s structure: how much equity is being invested, what the risk profile looks like, and how viable the exit strategy appears. For borrowers, understanding this relationship enables better deal packaging, more accurate risk assessment, and ultimately a higher likelihood of approval.

Improving Your Position Before You Apply

The strongest property finance applications are rarely accidental. They are the result of careful preparation and thoughtful deal design. Investors who understand how lenders interpret LTV, LTC, and GDV can actively improve their position before submitting an application.

Adding additional equity can improve both LTV and LTC, reducing the lender’s perceived risk and potentially unlocking lower rates. Enhancing GDV through strategic renovations or design improvements can increase end value and improve leverage ratios. Likewise, presenting a detailed cost breakdown, planning permissions, contractor quotes, and comparable valuations can give underwriters the confidence to support higher funding levels.

Lenders also differ in how they prioritise these ratios. Some specialist finance houses focus more on LTC, valuing developer commitment, while others lean heavily on GDV, especially if the exit relies on future sales. The key is to understand what matters most to your chosen lender and tailor your proposal accordingly.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Even experienced developers occasionally fall into traps that weaken their funding applications. The first is confusing LTV with LTC. The two ratios measure different things, and misrepresenting one for the other—especially in a development context—can signal inexperience or lack of clarity.

Another common issue is overestimating GDV. While optimism can be understandable, lenders will almost always apply their own, more conservative valuation. If your projections are unrealistic, they will discount your credibility and may reduce the loan amount offered.

Finally, failing to provide a clear exit strategy is one of the most damaging errors. Lenders are not just assessing the value of the property today—they are assessing how and when they will be repaid. Whether your plan is to refinance or sell, you must demonstrate a credible route to repayment backed by market evidence and financial forecasts.

Bringing It All Together

At its core, the interplay between LTV, LTC, and GDV determines both the feasibility of a project and the confidence of the lender. Each ratio tells part of the story, but only when combined do they reveal the full picture of leverage, cost discipline, and value creation.

A well-balanced deal will show that the borrower has sufficient equity invested, realistic cost management, and a strong final value projection. Achieving this balance allows borrowers not only to access funding more easily but also to negotiate better pricing and faster drawdowns.

Understanding these metrics is no longer optional for investors in 2025—it is essential. In a lending landscape defined by tighter regulation, higher capital costs, and increasing scrutiny, borrowers who can clearly articulate their deal metrics will stand out as sophisticated and reliable partners.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a good LTV for property investors in 2025?
Most lenders remain comfortable up to 75–80 per cent for residential and buy-to-let mortgages, although bridging loans and development finance products usually require lower leverage to mitigate risk.

How is LTC different from LTV?
LTV measures the relationship between the loan and the property’s value, while LTC measures the loan relative to total project costs, including land, materials, and construction. LTV focuses on security; LTC focuses on contribution.

What is the typical GDV cap for development projects?
Development lenders in 2025 generally restrict funding to around 65–70 per cent of GDV. This protects against market volatility and ensures that projects maintain sufficient profitability at exit.

Can I influence my GDV estimate?
Yes—by commissioning independent valuations and presenting recent comparable sales data. However, lenders will always verify figures with their own assessors to ensure consistency.

Do lenders treat experienced developers differently?
They do. Proven track records, strong financials, and reliable contractor teams can all justify higher leverage ratios and more flexible funding structures.

Want Help Navigating Today’s Market?

Book a free strategy call with one of our mortgage specialists.

We’ll help you find the smartest way forward—whatever rates do next.